On March 17, 2026, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a joint interpretation on the classification of digital assets. This was not staff guidance or an informal opinion letter. It was formal agency action, binding on both regulators, signed by SEC Chairman Paul Atkins and CFTC Chairman Michael Selig.
The interpretation introduces a five-category token taxonomy and contains one finding that changes the trajectory of the entire industry: most crypto assets are not themselves securities.
After more than a decade of regulation by enforcement, where crypto projects learned the rules only when they were sued, the United States now has a public framework that tells market participants which regulator oversees which asset and why.
The five-category token taxonomy
The joint interpretation classifies digital assets into five categories:
| Category | Description | Primary regulator |
|---|---|---|
| Digital commodities | Assets that function like commodities (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and 14-16 others) | CFTC |
| Digital securities | Tokens that represent equity, debt, or investment contracts | SEC |
| Payment stablecoins | Tokens pegged 1:1 to USD or low-risk reserves | Federal banking regulators (under GENIUS Act) |
| Digital collectibles | Non-fungible tokens representing unique digital items | Limited federal oversight |
| Digital tools | Utility tokens used within specific networks or platforms | Case-by-case analysis |
The most consequential category is digital commodities. Between 16 and 18 major cryptocurrencies were identified as falling into this classification, meaning they are regulated by the CFTC rather than the SEC. This distinction matters because CFTC regulation is designed for commodity markets, with different disclosure requirements, trading rules, and compliance structures than securities regulation.
What "not a security" means in practice
For years, the SEC treated most tokens as securities under the Howey test, a legal standard from a 1946 Supreme Court case about Florida orange groves. The test asks whether an asset represents an investment of money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profit from the efforts of others.
The joint interpretation narrows this approach. It acknowledges that while the initial sale of a token may involve a securities transaction (the fundraising event), the token itself, once trading on secondary markets, may not be a security. The underlying asset and the investment contract are distinct.
What this changes for investors:
- Exchange listings expand. U.S. exchanges can list digital commodities without SEC securities registration, potentially increasing available trading pairs significantly.
- Compliance costs drop. Projects classified as digital commodities face CFTC commodity regulation rather than full SEC securities disclosure, reducing legal and operational overhead.
- Institutional entry accelerates. Regulated firms that were prohibited from holding unregistered securities can now hold digital commodities under existing commodity frameworks.
- Legal uncertainty decreases. Projects no longer need to guess whether the SEC will classify their token as a security years after launch.
The GENIUS Act: stablecoin regulation is now law
The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) passed the Senate on June 17, 2025, with a 68-30 bipartisan vote, cleared the House on July 17, 2025, and was signed into law on July 18, 2025.
Key provisions:
- 1:1 reserve backing. Payment stablecoins must be backed dollar-for-dollar by U.S. dollars or low-risk liquid assets (short-term Treasuries, insured deposits).
- No interest or yield. Stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act cannot pay interest or yield to holders. This draws a clear line between stablecoins and deposit products.
- Not a security. Payment stablecoins are explicitly excluded from the definition of a security under federal securities law.
- Regulatory deadline. Implementing regulations must be promulgated by July 18, 2026, one year after enactment. Enforcement is expected to begin in Q3 2026.
The GENIUS Act creates a federal licensing framework for stablecoin issuers, with state-chartered issuers also eligible if they meet equivalent standards. This is the first comprehensive federal law specifically governing any category of digital asset.
Info
The GENIUS Act's prohibition on interest payments is a deliberate design choice. By preventing stablecoins from functioning as savings accounts, the law maintains a clear boundary between digital payment instruments and banking products.
The CLARITY Act: market structure legislation on deck
While the token taxonomy and the GENIUS Act address classification and stablecoins respectively, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) aims to establish comprehensive market structure rules for the entire crypto ecosystem.
Current status (April 2026):
- The Senate Banking Committee has a markup targeted for late April 2026.
- Senator Cynthia Lummis, chair of the crypto subcommittee, expects the bill to advance out of committee.
- A separate 400+ page formal rulemaking proposal is expected within weeks, including safe harbor provisions that would give projects a defined transition period to comply with new regulatory requirements.
The CLARITY Act covers which assets fall under SEC versus CFTC jurisdiction, how exchanges should be regulated, custody requirements, and reporting obligations. If enacted, it would complete the legislative framework that the GENIUS Act started.
Why institutional investors are paying attention
Goldman Sachs published research identifying this regulatory shift as a potential catalyst for the next wave of institutional crypto adoption. The logic is structural: regulated financial institutions operate within legal frameworks, and the absence of clear crypto regulation in the U.S. has been a primary barrier to institutional participation.
With a defined taxonomy, stablecoin legislation already signed into law, and market structure legislation advancing, several institutional barriers are falling simultaneously:
- Custody clarity. Banks and broker-dealers can establish custody solutions for digital commodities without the risk of holding unregistered securities.
- Fund structures. Asset managers can launch regulated funds holding classified digital assets with defined regulatory treatment.
- Insurance and audit. Insurers and auditors can price risk for digital commodity portfolios using established commodity market frameworks.
- Compliance certainty. Chief compliance officers can build programs around defined rules rather than evolving enforcement precedent.
Brazil context: a parallel regulatory evolution
While the United States builds its federal crypto framework, Brazil has been constructing its own. In February 2026, Central Bank Resolutions 519, 520, and 521 took effect, classifying stablecoins as foreign exchange operations and establishing licensing requirements for crypto service providers.
| Framework | United States | Brazil |
|---|---|---|
| Classification approach | 5-category token taxonomy (SEC/CFTC) | Stablecoins as FX operations (Central Bank) |
| Stablecoin law | GENIUS Act (signed July 2025) | Resolutions 519/520/521 (effective Feb 2026) |
| CBDC status | Digital dollar under study | Drex launching in 2026 |
| Market structure | CLARITY Act (committee markup April 2026) | Virtual Assets Law (2022) + Central Bank rules |
| Stablecoin usage | Growing but diverse | USDT accounts for over 90% of crypto volume |
Brazil's regulatory direction shares a common thread with the U.S. approach: bringing stablecoins under existing financial infrastructure rather than creating entirely new regimes. The difference is in scale and composition. Brazil's crypto market is overwhelmingly stablecoins used for foreign exchange purposes, while the U.S. market spans a broader range of asset types.
For investors operating across both markets, the convergence of regulatory frameworks creates a more predictable environment. Assets classified as digital commodities in the U.S. will likely receive clearer treatment in jurisdictions that reference American regulatory categories, and Brazil's own classification system provides additional local clarity.
What this means going forward
The March 17 joint interpretation, the GENIUS Act, and the advancing CLARITY Act represent the most significant regulatory development in crypto since Bitcoin's creation. For the first time, the U.S. has a public taxonomy, a signed stablecoin law, and market structure legislation in active committee consideration.
None of this eliminates risk. Crypto assets remain volatile. Regulatory frameworks can be amended. The CLARITY Act has not yet passed. And the transition from the old enforcement-driven regime to the new framework-driven one will take time.
But the direction is clear: the era of regulation by enforcement is ending, and the era of regulation by framework is beginning. For investors, that shift means more information, more legal certainty, and a significantly different risk profile than the one that existed even six months ago.
This article is educational content about financial regulation and does not constitute investment advice. Crypto assets involve significant risk. Past regulatory developments do not guarantee future market performance.
Royal Binary monitors regulatory developments across both U.S. and Brazilian markets to keep our community informed. Explore the platform at app.royalbinary.io.